What Do Young Children Learn From Pets?
Is a better understanding of biology
something children can learn from dogs and cats?
So, if a young child’s experiences of spending time with a pet are of being sociable with it, would you expect them to learn much about biology from this? It’s not like they are dealing with the biological end of things – feeding, grooming, cleaning, making sure the animal has peed and pooped. And yet they did show a better understanding of biological concepts.
A control group of adults did the same study, but they skipped drawing a picture of andro. Adults were equally likely to relate properties from humans to dogs as vice versa (i.e. if a dog has andro, so does a human).
Zazie Todd, PhD, is the author of Wag: The Science of Making Your Dog Happy
. She is the founder of the popular blog Companion Animal Psychology, where she writes about everything from training methods to the human-canine relationship. She also writes a column for Psychology Today and has received the prestigious Captain Haggerty Award for Best Training Article in 2017. Todd lives in Maple Ridge, BC, with her husband and two cats.
Useful links:
Muldoon, J., Williams, J., & Lawrence, A. (2014). 'Mum cleaned it and I just played with it': Children's perceptions of their roles and responsibilities in the care of family pets Childhood DOI: 10.1177/0907568214524457
Geerdts, M., Van de Walle, G., & LoBue, V. (2015). Daily animal exposure and children’s biological concepts Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 130, 132-146 DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.10.001
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. As an Etsy affiliate, I earn from qualifying Etsy purchases.
![]() |
Photo: elista/Shutterstock |
By Zazie Todd, PhD
Young children are very interested in animals. One study even found children aged 11 – 40 months would prefer to look at an animal behind a glass screen (even if the animal is fast asleep) rather than play with a toy (LoBue et al 2013). Now researchers are asking whether this interest in animals means that children with a cat or dog know more about biology than those without.
Young children are very interested in animals. One study even found children aged 11 – 40 months would prefer to look at an animal behind a glass screen (even if the animal is fast asleep) rather than play with a toy (LoBue et al 2013). Now researchers are asking whether this interest in animals means that children with a cat or dog know more about biology than those without.
The study, by Megan Geerdts (University of
North Carolina at Greensboro) et al, was in two parts. First of all, the
scientists needed to know how preschool children actually interact with cats
and dogs. Although this is observed by parents every day, it seems it hasn’t been
recorded in enough detail for science. So the researchers observed 24 preschool children in a
free-play session with their pet, and asked their parents to complete a questionnaire
about their child’s daily experiences with the animal. Then, in the second
part, they tested 3 – 5 year old children with and without a pet on their
knowledge of biological concepts.
First of all, the children’s interactions
with pets were mostly social. They were not really involved in taking care of
the animals, which is not surprising given their age. A study of older children
(age 7 – 13 years old) by Muldoon et al found
they also mostly had social interactions with their pets, and left the
care-taking to their parents.
Children typically interacted in reciprocal
ways that would elicit a response from the animal, such as holding out a hand
to be sniffed, trying to engage in play or giving the pet a command. The questionnaires
completed by parents confirmed that interactions were social, and children were
not involved in care-taking behaviour. They interacted with cats and dogs in the
same way, but girls interacted more than boys.
![]() |
Photo: Patricia Marks/Shutterstock |
So, if a young child’s experiences of spending time with a pet are of being sociable with it, would you expect them to learn much about biology from this? It’s not like they are dealing with the biological end of things – feeding, grooming, cleaning, making sure the animal has peed and pooped. And yet they did show a better understanding of biological concepts.
The way this was tested is pretty neat. If
you were to ask something like “People have a heart. Does your cat have a
heart?” you couldn’t rule out the possibility that some children might have
learned about hearts at their pre-school or playgroup and have existing prior
knowledge. So the researchers used a made-up word that none of the children
would have come across before.
96 children aged 2 - 6 took part in the
second study. One group were told, “People have andro inside them. Andro
is round and green and looks like this!” The child and experimenter drew a
picture of andro together. Then, the
child was asked whether various animals, plants and inanimate objects also had andro inside. Another group did the same
thing, but instead of being told that people have andro, they were told that dogs have andro.
Then the children were asked questions
about their own cat or dog (if they had one) and the experimenter’s cat or dog
(if they didn’t). The questions were about whether or not the cat or dog had
various psychological and physical properties, including emotions, sleep, food,
and parents.
A control group of adults did the same study, but they skipped drawing a picture of andro. Adults were equally likely to relate properties from humans to dogs as vice versa (i.e. if a dog has andro, so does a human).
Half of the children had a cat or dog, and just
like in the first study, their parents said their interactions were mostly
social. Amongst 3 year old and 5 year olds without pets, they were more likely
to relate properties from humans to dogs, rather than vice versa. If 5 year
olds had pets, they were more likely to relate properties from dogs to humans
than their peers without pets.
Five year olds and adults were more likely
to say properties applied to other living things rather than to plants and
inanimate objects. Three year olds tended to apply things equally to plants and
inanimate objects. Having a pet made no difference to these results.
But in both age groups, if a child had a
pet, they were more likely to say animals had biological properties compared to
children that don’t have a pet. This effect was not found for psychological
properties.
This study shows that children who have
social experience with pets are less likely to be anthropocentric in their
reasoning. The scientists say, “our findings help to support the hypothesis
that treating animals as social creatures may help children to analogically
understand animals as more similar to humans in other ways, including
biologically.”
What do you think children learn from their pets?
Zazie Todd, PhD, is the author of Wag: The Science of Making Your Dog Happy
Useful links:
- Check out what the Animal Book Club is reading this month
- Get Companion Animal Psychology merch
- Support me on Ko-fi
- Visit my Amazon store
Reference
LoBue, V., Bloom Pickard, M., Sherman, K., Axford, C., & DeLoache, J. (2013). Young children's interest in live animals British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 31 (1), 57-69 DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.2012.02078.x
Muldoon, J., Williams, J., & Lawrence, A. (2014). 'Mum cleaned it and I just played with it': Children's perceptions of their roles and responsibilities in the care of family pets Childhood DOI: 10.1177/0907568214524457
Geerdts, M., Van de Walle, G., & LoBue, V. (2015). Daily animal exposure and children’s biological concepts Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 130, 132-146 DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.10.001
You might also like:
What pets do children have, and which do they prefer?
Do children prefer baby-faced animals?
Does animal-assisted therapy help at-risk boys?
What pets do children have, and which do they prefer?
Do children prefer baby-faced animals?
Does animal-assisted therapy help at-risk boys?
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. As an Etsy affiliate, I earn from qualifying Etsy purchases.
Most children love animals/pets. I think children learn from their pets by learning their different behaviors such as being lovable and being happy. Having pets makes everything better for an example, if you’re stressed out or tired or even sick and you spend some quality time with your pet or play with them for a few minutes; it’ll make you feel better. Kids like to play with pets because they are fun to play with. In my opinion, if some children don’t have pets at home but their friends have pets at their house, I believe that they sometimes tend to play with the pets more than they play with their friends.
ReplyDelete