Sub-Optimal Choice in Dogs: Cheese or Cheese and Carrot?
Evidence suggests dogs do not always make the best
choice. A new study finds that far as food choice is concerned, they use the same heuristic previously demonstrated in humans and monkeys.
By Zazie Todd, PhD
This page contains affiliate links which means I may earn a commission on qualifying purchases at no cost to you.
P.S. Will work for hot dog and now where's my treat?
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Photo: Igor Sokolov (breeze) / Shutterstock |
By Zazie Todd, PhD
This page contains affiliate links which means I may earn a commission on qualifying purchases at no cost to you.
Earlier research has found that if people are asked to estimate the value of a set of 24
good condition dishes vs a set of 40 dishes (of which 31 are in good
condition), they tend to think the former is more valuable. The broken dishes
seem to detract from the fact the second set has more dishes in good condition.
This is known as the ‘less is more’ effect.
This effect has been demonstrated in monkeys, too. Monkeys
like grapes and they also like slices of cucumber, although not as much. If
given a choice between a grape vs a grape and a slice of cucumber, they tend to
choose the grape.
Does the same hold true for dogs? Kristina Pattison and Thomas Zentall (University of Kentucky) set out to investigate.
Does the same hold true for dogs? Kristina Pattison and Thomas Zentall (University of Kentucky) set out to investigate.
The experiment took place in a plain room at the University.
Since some dogs can be nervous in a new environment, dogs were given 5 minutes
to investigate the room, and then offered a piece of cheese, a piece of carrot,
followed by a piece of cheese with a piece of carrot. Dogs had to eat all of
these items in order to qualify to participate.
In the experiment, dogs were given a choice between a slice
of cheese or a slice of cheese and a slice of carrot. After demonstrating that
she had both items, the experimenter held her hands out with the items in the
palm, and the handler released the dog. As soon as the dog touched one of her
hands, the experimenter closed the other hand so the dog only had access to the
hand it had chosen. The dog was allowed to eat the item(s), then went back to
the handler to repeat the experience.
Ten pet dogs took part, including five mixed breeds, a
Cavalier King Charles Spaniel, a Siberian Husky, a Belgian Tervuren and a
Golden Retriever (the researchers don’t say what the other dog was).
The dogs showed a significant preference for a single piece
of cheese rather than a piece of cheese and a piece of carrot. On average across
all the dogs, cheese plus carrot was chosen only 27% of the time.
One of the ten dogs actually showed a consistent preference
for cheese plus carrot. Interestingly, this was a dog that was adopted as an
adult rescue, having previously been a stray. The authors hypothesized that he
may have had a greater motivation for choosing two items of food over one. In fact, they point out that the dogs in this
study and the monkeys in the monkey study all had relatively little motivation,
since they are well-fed and not starving.
Some dogs have a preference for going to the left or right
hand, and these dogs were weeded out in pre-tests. In addition, since it was theoretically
possible that dogs have a preference for a single item rather than two items,
there was another test in which dogs were given a choice between one slice of
cheese and two slices of cheese. They picked two slices of cheese 95% of the
time.
Why would people and dogs make this kind of choice? The
authors say,
“The less is more effect, first demonstrated in humans, is an affect heuristic that results in a preference for the qualitative over the quantitative evaluation of options. Its function appears to have been the rapid evaluation of alternatives. It is likely that in many cases it is relatively easy to judge the qualitative value of alternatives but perhaps more difficult to judge their quantitative value, and when rapid decisions are necessary, such heuristics may be quite functional. For example, within-species competition may favour rapid decisions because hesitation may result in losing food to a faster competitor.”Given the small sample size, further research is needed to see if this fascinating result applies widely.
The nice thing about this experiment is that it is
relatively easy to replicate at home. Why not give your dog this choice a few
times, and report back?
If you liked this post, check out my book Wag: The Science of Making Your Dog Happy. Modern Dog magazine calls it "The must-have guide to improving your dog's life."
Reference
Pattison, K., & Zentall, T. (2014). Suboptimal choice by dogs: when less is better than more Animal Cognition, 17 (4), 1019-1022 DOI: 10.1007/s10071-014-0735-2P.S. Will work for hot dog and now where's my treat?
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.