Is Timing an Important Feature of the Sounds Dogs Make?
How do dogs respond to other dogs' barks, played forwards or backwards?
By Zazie Todd, PhD
This page contains affiliate links which means I may earn a commission on qualifying purchases at no cost to you.
By Zazie Todd, PhD
This page contains affiliate links which means I may earn a commission on qualifying purchases at no cost to you.
I recently looked at the amazing story of how two dogs had
been taught to go into an fMRI scanner – the beginnings of canine neuroscience.
Today’s blog is about a study that takes a different, less hi-tech, approach to
understanding the canine brain. Siniscalchi et al were interested in how dogs
process other dogs’ vocalizations, and whether they show lateralization of the
hemispheres – in other words, whether the left half and right half of the dog’s
brain have different functions.
Eighteen pet dogs of various breeds took part. They were tested in a room at the University, with their owner present. A feeding bowl was set up with speakers on either side, and the dog’s favourite dry food was placed in the bowl. While the dog was feeding, the different sounds were played through the speakers. The dog’s reaction was observed as a head-turn to the right or left, or no direction. Each dog was tested several times, each period lasting up to 30 minutes, and returned to the lab for additional sessions, until each sound (forwards and backwards) had been tested seven times.
To begin with they needed to record some canine
vocalizations. They took four dogs (two mixed-breed, one Border Collie, and one
Rhodesian Ridgeback) and recorded the sounds they made during a disturbance,
isolation, and play. To get the disturbance recording, they had the dog in a
car with its owner, and a stranger approach. For the isolation recording, they
got the sound the dog made when left on its own. And finally, the play sound
came from a play session with a human.
They then made a set of stimuli, one which involved the normal
sound followed by silence, and the other which involved the sound played in
reverse followed by silence. If temporal features – aspects to do with timing –
are important, the dogs would respond differently to the signals played forwards and backwards.
![]() |
Photo: Ammit Jack / Shutterstock |
Eighteen pet dogs of various breeds took part. They were tested in a room at the University, with their owner present. A feeding bowl was set up with speakers on either side, and the dog’s favourite dry food was placed in the bowl. While the dog was feeding, the different sounds were played through the speakers. The dog’s reaction was observed as a head-turn to the right or left, or no direction. Each dog was tested several times, each period lasting up to 30 minutes, and returned to the lab for additional sessions, until each sound (forwards and backwards) had been tested seven times.
The results showed that when played the normal
vocalizations, dogs responded by turning their head to the right (right ear
leading). This is thought to mean that the left hemisphere is activated. When
the play signal was reversed, dogs turned their heads to the left (left ear
leading), which is thought to mean that the right hemisphere is activated. When
the isolation and disturbance sounds were played backwards, there was no
significant effect, although there was a tendency to turn the head to the left.
These differences suggest that temporal features of the
sounds dogs make are important, as has been found with primate signals (and of
course with human speech). The authors suggest that when the play signal is
reversed it is completely novel, and that the right hemisphere is responsible
for processing novel things. The play signal is a cooperative one, whereas the
noises made during isolation and disturbance are made even if the dog is alone.
They speculate that this is why they did not get a turn to the right for
disturbance and isolation sounds; because the play signal is the most co-operative, it is probably more fixed in its pattern.
This study shows that temporal features of canine
vocalizations are important, and also that the left hemisphere is involved in
understanding other dogs’ communications. This adds support to the idea that the canine brain has specialization of the hemispheres.
If you liked this post, check out my book Wag: The Science of Making Your Dog Happy. Modern Dog magazine calls it "The must-have guide to improving your dog's life."
Do you find it easy to understand the vocalizations that your dog makes?
Do you find it easy to understand the vocalizations that your dog makes?
Zazie Todd, PhD, is the award-winning author of Wag: The Science of Making Your Dog Happy and Purr: The Science of Making Your Cat Happy. She is the creator of the popular blog, Companion Animal Psychology, writes The Pawsitive Post premium newsletter, and also has a column at Psychology Today. Todd lives in Maple Ridge, BC, with her husband, one dog, and two cats.
Useful links:
Reference
Siniscalchi M, Lusito R, Sasso R, & Quaranta A (2012). Are temporal features crucial acoustic cues in dog vocal recognition? Animal cognition, 15 (5), 815-21 PMID: 22544303
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. As an Etsy affiliate and Marks and Spencer affiliate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. As an Etsy affiliate and Marks and Spencer affiliate, I earn from qualifying purchases.