Wednesday, 26 June 2013

Are seniors more satisfied with life if they have pets?

An older woman shakes paw with her spaniel
It’s widely assumed that pets add quality to our lives. We hear all the time that they can lower blood pressure, encourage us to get more exercise, and provide comfort if we are sad. There’s some truth to this – but is it always the case? A new study of people aged 65 and over investigates whether pet ownership is linked to higher satisfaction with life.

The study analyzes data from the Canadian Community Health Survey – Healthy Aging conducted by Statistics Canada. The survey collected data from more than 30,000 Canadians aged over 45 in 2008 and 2009. Chelsea Himsworth and Melanie Rock (Universities of BC and Calgary, respectively) looked at the data for those sixty-five or over, to see what effect pet ownership had. In total, 11,973 people had answered the questions that were needed for this study.

The majority of the seniors lived with someone else and most of these were married or co-habiting. Over 90% of them were white, and just over half were female. Over 90% reported having a chronic health condition. The average family income was less than 40,000 dollars a year. 

The survey asked if people had a household pet that provided them with companionship, and 27% said yes to this.

A set of questions called the Satisfaction with Life Scale was used. Previous studies with pets have tended to use a measure of quality of life; this is the first time the Satisfaction with Life Scale was used instead. It was chosen because it is a broad measure of satisfaction, that accounts for any medium-term changes that may be taking place without being affected by the mood of the moment. There are five questions in total and the results are added together. Then, people are divided into those who are satisfied and those who are not.

Himsworth and Rock analyzed the data to take account of variables including whether or not seniors lived alone, their marital status, and so on.  Education level and income were not linked to aspects related to pet ownership.

The results show that amongst older people who are married, co-habiting or living with someone else, those who own a pet are less satisfied with life. Amongst those who live alone but are not divorced, pet ownership was not related to life satisfaction. However, for seniors who are divorced and live alone, owning a pet was linked to greater satisfaction.

This is a very interesting set of results because it suggests that pet ownership in seniors should be seen in the context of broader family life. Amongst those who own pets, seniors’ relationships with other people affect the likelihood of them being satisfied with life.

The study is very large in scale and the sample is representative of the nation as a whole. However, because it is a one-off survey it raises many questions. For example, we don’t know about the timing of the acquisition of pets; had people who got divorced acquired a pet after the divorce, for example, as a way of helping them adjust? Amongst married seniors, is the one who acquired the pet also the one who takes responsibility for looking after it? Are some seniors more concerned than others about veterinary bills and what might happen to their pet if they could no longer look after it?

The question about pets was worded to ask about pets that provide companionship. It would be interesting for future research to ask seniors about attachment to their pet, to see what effect the quality of that relationship has.

The results of this study are fascinating, but also hard to interpret. Since sharing our lives with pets can add to our satisfaction with life, further research is needed to investigate the factors that affect this, and the way our relationships with other people also play a role. 

Does your pet get along with other members of your family?

Reference
Himsworth, C., & Rock, M. (2013). Pet Ownership, Other Domestic Relationships, and Satisfaction with Life among Seniors: Results from a Canadian National Survey Anthrozoos: A Multidisciplinary Journal of The Interactions of People & Animals, 26 (2), 295-305 DOI: 10.2752/175303713X13636846944448

4 comments:

  1. I wonder if the type of housing, the amount of help with housework, and the age of the pet might also be variables that need to be considered? Multi-level homes with stairs would be more of a challenge for seniors with aging pets (safety, ability to carry them up the stairs, etc); the extra mess from shedding fur and dirt tracked in would differentially affect those who do not have help with housework compared to those who do; younger pets may be more of a behavioural challenge and need more exercise than older ones.
    As a senior living alone with multiple pets, I know there are times when I think how nice would be to have only one - but I've also told my daughter that when I'm no longer able to live alone, my one criteria for a care facility is that it allows animals! My mom's facility has resident cats, and the staff are allowed to bring their dogs to work.

    ReplyDelete
  2. that's interesting. I am 57 and my husband is 63....I think our pets (our cat and dog) add to our happiness. The only possible way that we DO experience hardship is financial and that is because we are more or less on a "fixed" income

    ReplyDelete
  3. Not sure if you saw the footage of that woman after the Oklahoma hurricane who was being interviewed for a news station and found her dog on camera, under the rubble. That was super touching, and shows how much seniors can rely on the companionship of their pets.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yes housing is a key issue - accessibility in terms of physical design, also finances and rules on pet-ownership (even pet-visiting). Thanks for the input - Melanie Rock

    ReplyDelete