My Dog Comes First: The Importance of Pets to Homeless Youth
Dogs and cats have both advantages and disadvantages for
street-involved youth.
Research by Michelle Lem et al (University of Guelph) asks
homeless young people (aged 18-24) what their pet means to them. Previous
studies have focussed on the benefits to homeless people of owning a dog or
cat. The aim of this study was to get a balanced picture of both the advantages
and disadvantages.
Ten homeless young people took part in in-depth interviews
about their pet. 8 of them had a dog, and 2 had a cat but had previously had a
dog whilst homeless. Most lived on the street or in a vulnerable
housing situation (squatting/couch-surfing), and three had found
stable housing.
The main theme to emerge was that of putting the animal
first. Everyone in the study said they put their pet first, even if this meant
suffering hardship themselves. For example, they would not take up housing if
they could not bring the animal with them. This shows the value they place on
the companionship they get.
The authors point out that for some youth their relationship with their pet is the most meaningful relationship they have, and potentially the only loving relationship in their life. For example, one youth said, “My relationship with MacKenzie [the dog]… is the best I ever had.”
The authors point out that for some youth their relationship with their pet is the most meaningful relationship they have, and potentially the only loving relationship in their life. For example, one youth said, “My relationship with MacKenzie [the dog]… is the best I ever had.”
Some young men described sleeping on the street because they
were unable to find a shelter that would allow pets. Another had become
homeless because the dog was not allowed at the relative’s apartment where he
had been living.
One man described how he had a job, but with no home he had
nowhere to leave his dog while he went to work. At first he found someone to
mind the dog for him during the day, but they were not reliable which meant
that sometimes he could not go to work, and so he lost the job.
Pets helped people in several ways, such as providing
motivation to find housing that would allow pets, so that the dog would have a
roof over its head. For example, one said, “I love him and I get a place for
him. Really, like, if it wasn’t for him, I’d be on the streets.”
Some participants said the pet helped them to stay out
of trouble with the police and to use less drugs. (Some participants did not mention drug use).
There were different views about begging, with some saying
it was wrong to take an animal begging, and others liking to because it meant
they made more money.
There were stresses associated with looking after an animal.
One young woman said, “It’s really hard taking care of them because I can’t
always get them food… I’m worried that something might happen to them.” Several
people had lost an animal, in one case when it was run over, and in two cases
when it was taken in by animal control (following arrest/being sent to jail)
and subsequently euthanized.
The authors say,
“Companion animals appear to serve as a vehicle for youth to learn about unconditional love, trust, and constancy in a relationship. With such strength of attachment, it is not surprising that youth consistently choose to forego opportunities for shelter, housing and employment in order to be with their companion animals. Although these choices may be to the detriment of their own health and success in getting off the street, for some youth this “Pet before self” theme may be a driver for reducing their use of drugs and hence number of arrests, as well as beneficially affect their daily activities by creating structure and routine.”
The research took place in Toronto and Ottawa, and involved very
detailed interviews with a small number of people. The advantage is a rich
dataset, but it is not possible to generalize from such a small sample and so more research is needed.
The recommendations will be especially helpful to organizations that cater to homeless people. Suggestions include allowing pets in some shelters, schemes to make pet food and veterinary care available to the homeless, and even dog daycare at shelters to help people transition into employment.
The recommendations will be especially helpful to organizations that cater to homeless people. Suggestions include allowing pets in some shelters, schemes to make pet food and veterinary care available to the homeless, and even dog daycare at shelters to help people transition into employment.
Some organizations have programs to assist with pet food and vet care for homeless and low income people. For example, the BC SPCA has an outreach program called Charlie's Food Bank, which goes to Vancouver's DownTown East Side every Thursday morning.
The importance of housing does not only apply to people who are homeless – lack of suitable housing is a very common reason for companion animals to be surrendered to humane societies. Making more pet-friendly housing available would benefit both people and their pets.
You might also like: Homeless youth with pets are less depressed than those without
The importance of housing does not only apply to people who are homeless – lack of suitable housing is a very common reason for companion animals to be surrendered to humane societies. Making more pet-friendly housing available would benefit both people and their pets.
You might also like: Homeless youth with pets are less depressed than those without
Reference
Lem, M., Coe, J.B., Haley, D.B., Stone, E., & O'Grady, W. (2013). Effects of companion animal ownership among Canadian street-involved youth: A qualitative analysis Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, XL (4), 285-304.