Companion Animal Psychology

In this week’s edition of the series on positive reinforcement and dog training , I investigate whether small dogs are treated differently than large dogs. By Zazie Todd, PhD This page contains affiliate links which means I may earn a commission on qualifying purchases at no cost to you. People often wonder if little dogs behave differently because people let them get away with more due to their size, but is it true? The answer comes from a large-scale study by Christine Arhant and colleagues in Vienna. Since Viennese dogs must be registered with the city, they posted a questionnaire to a random sample of registered dog-owners. They received 1276 responses from owners of pet dogs that lived in the home with them. For the purposes of this study, 20kg was the cut-off for small dogs; any dog that weighed more than 20kg was considered a large dog . The questionnaire asked about training techniques and dog behaviour, as well as characteristics of the dog.    Photo: OLJ Studio/Shu

A study finds people who only use positive reinforcement report their dogs are less attention-seeking, aggressive or fearful. By Zazie Todd, PhD This is the third part in a  series about positive reinforcement and dog training . Photo: Christian Mueller/Shutterstock This page contains affiliate links which means I may earn a commission on qualifying purchases at no cost to you. This week I’m looking at another questionnaire study of ordinary dog owners and the way they train their dogs . The study was conducted by Emily Blackwell and colleagues, and involved 192 dog owners that were recruited from three counties in the UK. They seem to be typical owners of typical dogs, as the sample included a wide range of breeds, a mix of genders (neutered/spayed/or not), and a range of different ages. Owners were asked whether their dogs had attended training or puppy socialization classes, the methods they had used to train them at home, and about any problem behaviours the dogs

Training with rewards is linked to more obedient dogs with fewer problem behaviours, according to a survey of owners. Photo:  leungchopan/Shutterstock By Zazie Todd, PhD This page contains affiliate links which means I may earn a commission on qualifying purchases at no cost to you. This is the second part in a series about the research on  positive reinforcement and dog training. You can read the first part  here . This week, we’re looking at study by EF Hiby et al that asked dog owners about their training methods and how effective they were. The researchers approached people walking their dogs at seven popular dog-walking locations in Southampton and Cambridge, such as Southampton Common and Gog Magog Down. They asked them to complete a questionnaire about how they had trained their dog on the basic tasks of sit, leave it, come and walk to heel, as well as how they would react to the common issues of house training, chewing, and stealing items such as food. They

This week is the start of a series about the science of positive reinforcement in dog training. By Zazie Todd, PhD Whether you already use positive reinforcement , or you’re yet to be sold on the idea, this series is for you. I’m going to look at studies that investigate different methods of training, and consider what they mean for the average dog owner. Some time ago, there was a change in the way dogs are trained. Instead of using punishment when dogs did the wrong thing, people started to reward dogs for doing the right thing – and ignore what they did wrong, or distract them from it. But in everyday life, you hear people talk about dominance in dogs , even though we know that dominance – as the term is usually used – is a myth. And when you watch TV, some trainers still use punishment. You can watch two different dog programmes and see completely different approaches to the same problem, whether it’s pulling on a leash, begging at table, or growling at skateboards and